No, you probably can’t sue Pharma over the emergency use of vaccine-related strokes, heart attacks, or wrongful death, even over Remdesevir, unless you can prove fraud. There are other procedures, but you will probably waste your time if you suffer a vaccine-related injury. With so much misinformation and biased fact-checking in favor of large corporations selling vaccines (See bias example), our lawyers decided to cut through the BS. Below, our best personal injury lawyer and a medical researcher with medical knowledge, Michael Ehline, will provide a basic understanding of how big pharma can easily manipulate the press and social media companies while simultaneously infusing billions of dollars into political campaigns.
We leave it up to you to decide if this was done in exchange for favorable market monopolization and even forced mRNA technology vaccinations on the public as a condition precedent to your employment, military service, public school, etc. Besides not being able to sue Big Pharma, you can’t sue the Food and Drug Administration for authorizing a vaccine for emergency use. You also cannot hold your employer accountable if they require “inoculation” [there is that word again] as a condition of employment. (Source – Dorit Reiss, professor, University of California Hastings)
In full disclosure, I am just a lawyer, and one of my family members died of thrombosis days after their jab. Many of my other friends who took the jab are experiencing a wide variety of health issues, and they ALL still got Covid [or was it the flu?]
“… incidence rate of cardiac adverse events in boys aged 12-15, around three times higher than estimated by the CDC.
You Won’t Receive Lawsuit Compensation for Damages?
True. Unless you can prove fraud or wilful misconduct, you are screwed if you try and bring a lawsuit. We will explore the reasons why after explaining more about how these rules came into play. Historically, vaccinations have been necessary to protect yourself from harmful diseases before they become fatal. Its main purpose is to assist the body’s immune system in manufacturing antibodies to a specific condition, such as coronavirus, so the body can overcome any infection.
According to the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), measles, mumps, the flu, and others did not spread because of the effective vaccine programs that fully inoculated and eradicated diseases! Bravo!
The Rush for the COVID-19 Vaccine
Due to the emergency of the COVID-19 pandemic and the loss of lives [we now know these were the same types of people who were at a higher risk to die already, just as they would have been with the regular flu – obese, cancer patients, elderly, etc.], there was insufficient time for vaccine manufacturers to research the virus properly. The CDC recently apologized for inflating COVID-19 deaths. (Source.)
This Vaccine Did Not Fit the Historical Definition of Vaccine?
mRNA is gene therapy and does contain the actual virus as a historic vaccine does.
Because none of the authorized COVID-19 vaccines in the United States contain the live virus that causes COVID-19, the vaccine cannot make you sick with COVID-19. (Source CDC.)
So mRNA gene therapy is a synthetic version of what physicians think your body will recognize as the virus, which spikes proteins to fight what these scientists believe the virus looks like to your body. As COVID-19 was a constantly mutating virus, as all flus are, many doctors not receiving royalties from Pharma argued all along that even if the mRNA did fight COVID-19, the chances of the patient having the original variant were slim to none. That is why many physicians argued for Ivermectin and Oxychloriquine, as these medicines could fight the symptoms and allow the body to develop antibodies naturally.
Like anabolic steroids, it’s a synthetic variant of a substance found in or out of our bodies. Unlike anabolics, mRNA tricks the DNA into penetrating your cells, according to at least one MIT/Harvard study.
Also, please note that these are respected scientists from MIT and Harvard.
Quoting from the original peer-reviewed paper:
“In support of this hypothesis, we found chimeric transcripts consisting of viral fused to cellular sequences in published data sets of SARS-CoV-2 infected cultured cells and primary cells of patients, consistent with the transcription of viral sequences integrated into the genome. To experimentally corroborate the possibility of viral retro-integration, we describe evidence that SARS-CoV-2 RNAs can be reverse transcribed in human cells by reverse transcriptase (RT) from LINE-1 elements or by HIV-1 RT and that these DNA sequences can be integrated into the cell genome and subsequently be transcribed. Human endogenous LINE-1 expression was induced upon SARS-CoV-2 infection or by cytokine exposure in cultured cells, suggesting a molecular mechanism for SARS-CoV-2 retro-integration in patients. This novel feature of SARS-CoV-2 infection may explain why patients can continue to produce viral RNA after recovery and suggests a new aspect of RNA virus replication.”
Actual study here: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33330870/ Zhang, Liguo, Alexsia Richards, Andrew Khalil, Emile Wogram, Haiting Ma, Richard A. Young, and Rudolf Jaenisch.
As noted above, mRNA can become integrated into your DNA, which is why so many “vaccinated” youths are dying suddenly from thrombosis or myocarditis at RECORD levels, according to many doctors not receiving ROYALTY PAYMENTS FROM THE PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRY. Anyone who disagreed with the pharmaceutical companies and physicians receiving or benefitting financially from the “vaccine” were labeled as “conspiracy theorists” or “junk scientists.”
In fact, alternative medicine and opinions of world-renowned physicians and cardiologists were moved off the front page of search results, and media outlets paid handsomely to market the vaccines went to work discrediting anyone who disagreed with the official narrative.
CDC Changes Legal Definition of Vaccine After Being Forced to Admit it Does Not Stop Transmission or Prevent Covid-19
mRNA gene therapy does not fall within the scientific definition of what we knew as vaccines prior to Anthony Fauci taking charge. When it was revealed that the COVID-19 vaccine does not INOCULATE people and instead controls symptoms and DOES NOT prevent the virus from spreading, the CDC changed the definition of vaccination from inoculating to controlling symptoms with protection.
Legal Definition of “Vaccination” Changed to “Protection” From “Immunity” After CDC Forced to Admit Vaccine Does Not Prevent Transmission?
Before the change, the definition of “vaccination” read, “the act of introducing a vaccine into the body to produce immunity to a specific disease.” Now, the word “immunity“ has been switched to “protection.“
The term “vaccine” also got a makeover. The CDC’s definition changed from “a product that stimulates a person’s immune system to produce immunity to a specific disease” to the current “a preparation that is used to stimulate the body’s immune response against diseases.”
Fact check sites, Fauci, and the government, of course, said there was nothing scandalous about the timing of the definition of vaccine being changed to exactly fit what the Covid-19 vaccine, as well as Ivermectin, could always do, provide “protection” aka, controls symptoms and stimulate natural immunity.
However, a CDC spokesperson told McClatchy News the “slight changes in wording over time … haven’t impacted the overall definition.” (Source, Miami Herald.)
In any event, no matter how many biased fact checks, the effect is that “scientists” (employees of Pfizer, etc.) still get to call it a vaccine since they no longer have to say it “inoculates,” which it doesn’t. This was the effect of changing the medical and scientific clinical definitions. In other words, since a vaccine no longer must innoculate, research grants and government money /health directives/mandates will still flow. And if you don’t like it, “screw your freedom.” (Source, Arnold Schwarzenegger.)
NIH has recommended you take the mRNA injection regardless of the fact it does not inoculate as the Polio vaccine had done to “fight” the virus. So NIH spokespeople like Anthony Fauci and researchers who receive royalty payments from big pharma (in law, this is called a “conflict of interest”) have asserted there was a need for the emergency use of COVID-19 vaccines.
Once people received the vaccination, many began to experience serious symptoms. My children lost their grandmother to thrombosis days after her injection. So, I do have my own bias, but I am not an anti-vaxxer.
I do not trust mRNA technology completely; I do trust the polio vaccines. (they INOCULATE people) and as a personal injury lawyer, I have personal knowledge that it can take years to know about all the sides of drugs. It’s shameful that my brethren in the personal injury law community have apparently swept this under the rug in favor of politics.
BIAS + Conflict of Interest?
A politician who gets political donations from the pharmaceutical industry has zero credibility with me based on the traditional rules of evidence and legal bias. I would call these witnesses hostile under CA Evidence Section 776.
No one from the CDC asked for my mother-in-law’s information on the cause of death, and I would assume there are many other families who do not have this data logged in any official reports either. In other words, we will never know the actual death numbers because no one is even looking at all of them.
We do know from the scant reports collected that:
Heart attacks are increasing in young adults under the age of 40 — including those in their 20s and 30s.
Incidentally, the FDA failed to fight FOIA requests to make public the data the FDA and other government-paid doctors relied on concerning the licensing of Pfizer-BioNTech’s COVID-19 vaccines, arguing that people should have to wait 76 years to get that information.
“This is a large and concerning number of negative health impacts,” Siri said of ICAN’s conclusions, adding that he’s aware of no comparable public data for other vaccines. (Reuters)
“Until ICAN’s suit, the v-safe data was not public…”
When the information was released late by the FDA, the media seemingly pounced on any data that came from outside the CDC as the source was probably biased because of “vaccine skepticism.” The implication appears that if you disagree with the CDC, you are an “anti-vaxxer.”
Alternative Views on Treatment Swatted Down at Direction of Government Agencies?
The CDC says all bad sides are “rare.” The problem is that public trust is waning, as more and more revelations are coming about “royalty payments” to NIH officials and the relationship between the CDC and heads of large drug companies. Many scientists have said that COVID-19 is an upper respiratory illness that can be controlled with Ivermectin, Oxychlroriquine, hydration, rest, and vitamins.
Before the “vaccine,” Anthony Fauci said:
“natural immunity is the best immunity.”See video below in FULL CONTEXT
[These traditional therapies helped the body control the symptoms without creating DNA protein spikes and other harmful, deadly sides.]
In response, the CDC placed images of a horse on its website and inferred that Ivermectin was a horse pill. CNN and other pundits declared Ivermectin as a horse and dog medicine. Anyone prescribing it was a junk scientist and made fun of anyone who refused to take the jab, ostracizing them and even calling them criminals.
However, Ivermectin (about 25 cents for a pill) has been registered for use in humans since 1987, and many countries, including El Salvador, gave it out to its citizens cheaply to treat COVID-19 without altering their DNA structure or creating spike protein issues we now know exist with jabbed kids and young adults.
These alternative medicine scientists said using a respirator is not the correct treatment for the FLU. Elon Musk’s Twitter dump revealed that the FBI had been flagging these world-famous doctors and trying to destroy their careers. Their job, apparently under orders from the Biden Admin, was to have user accounts banned from Twitter for going against the CDC/media partnership narrative!
During the Covid outbreak, the flu was apparently eradicated worldwide. The side effects associated with the COVID-19 vaccine range from fatigue to pain, fever, headaches, chills, nausea, vomiting, joint pain, and swelling of the lymph nodes. There have also been reports of severe heart inflammation caused by the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines.
The Johnson & Johnson vaccine caused serious injuries, such as severe blood clots, nerve disorders, blurred vision, severe headaches, shortness of breath, and persistent stomach pain, which caused many fatalities. We conclude that people harmed by a COVID-19 vaccine deserve compensation.
Is the Employer Accountable for COVID-19 Vaccines in the Workplace?
With the population returning to work, employers are faced with the issue of whether they can insist that a person employed by their company be vaccinated.
The FDA had no option but to grant the drug manufacturers immunity from personal injury and product liability lawsuits to encourage the creation and use of the new COVID-19 vaccine.
In the workplace, requiring a vaccine is a health and safety rule, and there are a few notable exceptions regarding employment. Such exceptions include whether a company belongs to a union.
In such instances, the employer and the employee must enter into a collective bargaining agreement should there be no consensus on whether the COVID-19 vaccine should be taken. If you do not want to take the vaccine for religious or other reasons, the anti-discriminatory laws protect the individual under the Americans with Disabilities Act.
To expedite the production process, the government granted immunity to many pharmaceutical manufacturers.
Can You Sue Pfizer or Moderna Over Covid Vaccine Side Effects?
You cannot sue Pfizer or Moderna – the manufacturers of the Covid-19 vaccine – if you experience any side effects. This is because the Federal government has granted these vaccine manufacturers immunity from liability.
Due to the declared public health emergency, the Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act of 2005 (PREP ACT) empowers the Health and Human Services Secretary to immunize the public and implement countermeasures. This is done by providing legal protection to pharmaceutical companies and healthcare providers by excluding them from liability for manufacturing the coronavirus vaccine.
These pharmaceutical companies are immune from legal action claims because COVID-19 vaccines are required for disease control and save lives.
However, the only exception for liability by these manufacturers was death or serious physical injury caused by ‘willful conduct.’
What Are Willful Misconduct Claims?
Willful misconduct claims are generally difficult to prove. There are a number of rules you need to comply with. If you decide to sue, you will need a good attorney.
If the vaccine manufacturer cannot be held responsible, can an individual sue the FDA for unintentionally causing the side effects because they approved the use of the vaccine?
Unfortunately, the FDA falls under sovereign immunity and cannot be held accountable for approving or disapproving the Pfizer or Johnson vaccine.
Can Anyone be Held Liable for These Side Effects?
Until the amendments have been made to the PREP Act, people who have suffered side effects due to the vaccination can file a claim with the US Department of Health and Human Services.
Furthermore, the government has come to the rescue of those individuals who suffered peril at the hands of COVID-19 [inoculation] – they have promoted the Countermeasures Injury Compensation Program (CICP). You will definitely need a lawyer if you pursue a claim via CIPC.
To qualify to file a claim with the CICP, you will have to prove you suffered a serious physical injury that resulted in hospitalization or disability and that your injuries were a direct result of the use of a covered countermeasure, including the COVID-19 vaccine. The experienced attorneys at Ehline Law Firm can assist in lodging such claims. Keep in mind, historically, very few people have received anything!
What Damages Will You Receive?
Should you succeed with your claim, you will be eligible for compensation for reasonable medical expenses and lost wages in the amount of $50,000 per annum. Furthermore, should a victim die, a surviving family member will be compensated with a survivor’s death benefit capped at $370,376 in total. However, you only have a year from the date you received the vaccination to file a claim with CICP. And since the government is precisely trying to locate victims or even warn people, good luck knowing you even have a case.
You will not be compensated for legal fees, pain, or suffering. It is not just considering the original misinformation that if you took the vaccine, it was safe and that it would prevent Covid-19. Since we were not forced to wait 76 years, we got the data, and it’s not even close.
Success Rate for These Claims Only 29 Out of 449 in Ten Years?
Those specializing in vaccine litigation have not received much success with these claims. The claims are difficult to file and prove, so hiring an experienced and knowledgeable lawyer is highly recommended.
Also worrisome to some vaccine injury lawyers is the fact that the CICP has rejected a majority of the compensation requests made since the program began 10 years ago. Of the 499 claims filed, the CICP has compensated only 29 claims, totaling more than $6 million. (Source – MSNBC)
Experienced attorneys believe it is more sensible to claim for Covid vaccine injuries under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Programme (VICP). It has proven to be more effective and efficient.
Compared to the CIPC program, the manufacturers of these vaccines provide the funding through an exercise tax on the licensed vaccines.
What Claims Can You File?
You may file vaccine injury cases and personal injury claims via the VICP. This program has paid out far more to eligible victims [$4.4 billion in compensation since 2006]. However, you will be required to make a detailed statement of the allegations of the severe side effects suffered as a result of the coronavirus when filing your claims.
Longer Time to Sue?
This program allows you to file a claim for an injury within three years after the first symptom or side effect. Death claims must be filed within two years of the death and not later than four years after the commencement of the first side effect that resulted in death.
Also, unlike CICP, the VICP permits you to be compensated for legal fees, medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.
What’s the Catch?
The only problem with the VICP program is that the Covid-19 vaccine is not eligible. This can be fixed by petitioning a legislative amendment to add Covid vaccines to its list of permissible inoculations. Big Pharma, including Pfizer Biotech, Genevant Sciences, and Arbutus Biopharma, has invested billions of dollars in protecting and pushing their gene therapy and even filed lawsuits to protect the “vaccine” technology. But the victims of the shot have a meager chance of getting any justice.However, the ultimate decision lies with the authority of the US Court of Federal Claims. Another possible compensation program is the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986. This legislation protects the manufacturers of vaccines from liability for vaccine side effects. The program’s compensation is unique since you do not have to prove the manufacturer’s fault or willful misconduct.
Moderna Sues Pfizer and BioNTech
While you can’t sue Moderna or Pfizer, Moderna has sued Pfizer and BioNTech for patent infringement over the Covid-19 vaccine. The outcome of this is sure to shake things up even further! The bottom line here is if someone you love died or suffered injuries from mRNA gene therapy, you likely have no right to recover compensation for your damages and injuries. It is highly unlikely that most victims are even being tallied.
Canada Says Not So Fast
In Canada, the Trudeau regime states that vaccinated people dying of abnormal heart conditions have to do with victims not having immunity to the flu since the flu had not been a problem during COVID-19. This is not a joke, either. In other words, you could get Covid during flu season, but not the flu.
Following the second dose of the vaccine, the group found a 162.2 per million incidence rate of cardiac adverse events in boys aged 12-15, around three times higher than estimated by the CDC. In boys aged 16-17, the group also found a higher rate than estimated by the CDC by around 40%, 94 individuals per million vaccinations. The rate of adverse events was also higher than estimated by the CDC amongst girls, 13 and 13.4 per million in those aged 12-15 or 16-17, respectively.(Source)
Have You Experienced Severe Side Effects Because of the Vaccine?
Suppose you’ve experienced severe side effects because of the vaccine and want to file for compensation. In that case, you will hear from virtually all injury attorneys that they can’t do anything for now but collect your information and push for legislation and an independent prosecutor not associated with the present DOJ leadership, which will be hard. Suing a vaccine manufacturer is complex, and due to their relationship funding political campaigns and even pop culture (Pfizer sponsors the Grammys, etc.), the younger generation won’t be the most favorable jury.
Most social media seem to be filled with bots who will pounce on anyone who questions the official narrative. Lawyers and doctors risk being deplatformed if they go against the Pharma-paid narratives. Most critical fact-check labels are highly misleading and often check facts that are not even argued as a basis in the source material. Ellon Musk and the Twitter document dumps have now proven we were misled.
However, assuming we can get some decent consumer legislation passed, we’ll fight aggressively for your rights. So, at some point, you may even be able to sue Big Pharma civilly or assist a state prosecutor in bringing criminal fraud charges.
- Evidence grows more vital for Covid vaccine link to heart issue – NBC News
- Vaccine study of 23 million shows risk of ‘heart problems
- Data suggests sudden adult death syndrome due to vaccines.
- More than 100 Ontario youth were sent to hospitals for vaccine-related heart problems.
- The risk of heart inflammation is higher with the Moderna vaccine.
The sources in this article have been fully fact-checked according to the journalistic standards of the Associated Press. We strive for accuracy and truth in media. Please send requests for corrections to us using our convenient online Contact Us form.
Michael Ehline is an inactive U.S. Marine and world famous legal historian. Michael helped draft the Cruise Ship Safety Act and has won some of the largest motorcycle accident settlements in U.S. History. Together with his legal team, Michael and the Ehline Law Firm collect damages on behalf of clients. We pride ourselves in being available to answer your most pressing and difficult questions 24/7. We are proud sponsors of the Paul Ehline Memorial Motorcycle Ride, and a a Service Disabled Veteran Operated Business. (SDVOB.) We are ready to fight.
Go here for for More Verdicts and Settlements