The answer is YES, undocumented immigrants can obtain a California Driver’s License (CDL), despite their legal status. Let’s find out why.
To drive legally in California, you must obtain a California Driver’s license. California residents can obtain a California Driver’s license without legal presence. And this is important, because you cannot obtain valid California auto liability insurance without a California Driver’s license.
California offers undocumented people with no legal presence an option known as the “AB 60” driver’s license.
Suppose an illegal alien meets California DMV requirements and can provide proof of identity and California residency, whether illegal or not. In that case, they can register a car, get a license, and even car insurance. These California driver’s licenses, as well as immigration law, generally can be hard for a non-lawyer to understand. If you or a close loved one needs help with documentation, a California immigration lawyer may be your best bet.
Sixteen states and the District of Columbia have enacted laws to allow unauthorized immigrants to obtain driver’s licenses.
These almost entirely democrat, single party states include:
These laws aim to create a standard driver’s license or identification that does not require proof of lawful presence. These laws typically prohibit the motor vehicle administrations from disclosing residency information to federal, state or local law enforcement agencies who enforce U.S. immigration law.
Federal limits apply whenever states have primary authority of things in their state under the 10th Amendment and certain case law. Federal immigration authorities cannot stop California democrats from violating law enforced by federal officials. Since the states are sovereign, the feds can only intervene when states deprives citizens of their enumerated rights under the U.S. Constitution, such as the right or free speech, etc.
Driver license applicants in California who are undocumented immigrants, are perfectly eligible to obtain state issued driver’s licenses, but they will not be valid for federal identification purposes. An AB60 driver’s license is also not valid for employment, or U.S. elections. Get it?
Democrats in New York recently voted to allow illegals to vote there. Although a judge rightly decided this is totally “illegal,” there is a trend in blue states to usher in these Census shifting populations and pay for them with your taxes, and nothing can be done.
President Donald Trump (Republican = Red) did successfully issue an executive order to stop states from letting democrats use illegals to change voting districts blue. But president Joe Biden (Democrat = Blue) immediately tore up that executive order and ordered construction or Trump’s fully funded border wall to cease. Biden claims that a border wall won’t stop illegals from crossing those wide open sections of the border, which many ICE officials, Israel, and border states reject.
Legal status used to work like this, if you snuck across the California County Sheriff, or local police officers would contact Immigration Customs Enforcement (ICE) and the alien would deported. However, California realized it could create more congress people by flooding the state with illegals, thereby manipulating the U.S. Census.
Republicans argue this is what helped California become a single-party state and rapidly turned it blue in a “woke,” populist wave. Now undocumented immigrants are slowly splitting blue districts in the few red counties left, effectively eliminating Republican counties in the state. Many experts claim this is the true reason illegals are being offered free health care, cell phones and other benefits at your expense.
Obtaining a California Driver’s license from the California Department of Motor Vehicles, even if you have a criminal record, is one of the benefits of violating U.S. immigration law. The bottom line, is that the immigrant is not violating California law. This is because an exception exists for California Driver License applicants here illegally under U.S. regulations.
“Illegal alien” is no longer a politically correct term to describe a person who came across the U.S. border or overstayed a visa in violation of federal law. But under U.S. federal law, it remains a term used to describe a class of people who are illegally in the country without permission from all over the world.
The term is a legal classification outlined in federal law as follows:
Section 1252(c) “Aliens and Nationality” – “Authorizing State and local law enforcement officials to arrest and detain certain illegal aliens.” ICE and other law enforcement are authorized to:
“…arrest and detain an individual who— (1) is an alien illegally present in the United States; and (2) has previously been convicted of a felony in the United States and deported or left the United States after such conviction.”
But many terms exist that can describe the same type of person who snuck across or overstayed their travel, or student Visa without permission, including:
“inadmissible aliens” or “unauthorized aliens.” Su wrote that “inadmissible aliens” and “deportable aliens” are different individuals under the INA, and have specific criteria, he said, with “inadmissible aliens” probably “closest to how the term ‘illegal aliens’ is commonly used (federal law treats those who enter without inspection to be construed as not having been ‘admitted’)” (See above source).
But due to the number of terms to describe someone here without permission, “illegal alien” has been the term that has stuck. Liberals believe the term is racist, and conservatives think the name is simply a legal term to describe someone who broke the law. As a result, liberal cities and states have declared themselves sanctuary states, and are now offering illegal aliens special protections from federal law not available to natural-born citizens. California set down a controversial path when it decided to issue driver’s licenses to illegal immigrants.
The reasoning went that these alien immigrants would now be covered with automobile insurance in case of a crash. So like all pretexts with good intentions, the reasons are given to give these people valid identifications were reducing and spreading many risks on California’s roads. One of the issues that led to the decision was the high number of hit and run accidents that occurred after an uninsured driver hit another vehicle or pedestrian.
What California is finding out quickly is that this well-meaning bit of social engineering made the situation worse– a lot worse. Some of the illegals did get the required insurance. But many others decided not to keep the policy. So now, the state needs all drivers to show proof of insurance when receiving a license– but not during the period afterward. Accordingly, it has become a prevalent trend for illegal immigrants to drop coverage the day they receive their licenses.
Growing out of Assembly Bill 60, Governor Jerry Brown signed it into law in 2013 as one of his significant accomplishments. Recently, the Fresno Bee published an editorial in which it explained that the issue with drivers sans insurance did not go away. In 2014 a half million illegals gained driver’s licenses under the plan.
California expanded a program to allow these drivers to buy subsidized auto insurance. So far just a paltry 875 have. During a similar period, the California Highway Patrol reported 66,000 citations for operating a vehicle with no insurance.
Good intentions often have adverse outcomes. In fact, there have been high-profile crashes in which drivers will give false information to the other driver or police. However, this has reached near epidemic levels, with many accident cases going unsolved.
It has hit many in the legal field especially hard, as, it has become desperate to take on auto accident liability cases because of these factors. The problem only compounds as those that cause such accidents to drive off with little to no repercussions.
New Jersey is considering going down a similar path, local media reported. So the disaster on California’s roads should act as a lesson, rather than a precedent for other states. Rather than being an act of compassion, the state’s activism has instead directly led to hundreds of unreported accidents. And because of this, there are untold numbers of injuries and fatalities.
Our legislators in Sacramento have the opportunity to step up over the next several years. At least they could put in place much stricter guidelines to check insurance. After all, this would significantly reduce strain on drivers fearing a hit-and-run accident. And this helps serve justice in and out of court.