This is a touchy topic. But we may never know the truth. For parents and caregivers with a weak stomach, I caution you when reading this.
Rape is defined as:
“The penetration, no matter how slight, of the vagina or anus with any body part or object, or oral penetration by a sex organ of another person, without the consent of the victim.” (Source).
This article deals with multiple allegations by correctional officers. Also included is testimony from at least one language interpreter. This report provides evidence of the U.S. government’s black operations and “rape dogs” for prisoner interrogation. Finally, we cover the subsequent spike in reports of U.S. children sexually assaulted by dogs. These attacks were clearly by trained dogs assaulting in the same manner as alleged by the camp guards.
This article will then delve into the post-war U.S. and the potential connection between depraved, possibly sexually perverted former U.S. interrogators and these attacks. Afterward, we will discuss the possible chances of suing for personal injuries. The goal here is to get money damages for these children. But there are many pitfalls and possibilities.
Over the last decade and a half, the prolonged wars worldwide have had many effects on the United States and the world. We must consider war’s costs, injuries, and deaths, including the sheer psychological toll affecting many returning soldiers, including military service animals and former interrogators owning and control these animals. Disturbing allegations are spreading across the internet, reportedly backed by a Fairfax County, Virginia Police Department investigation.
In 2007, investigator Flint Waters told the Congressional Internet Crimes Against Children Task-force that he saw a graphic photo of a child raped by a dog.
The above allegations seem backed by a recent article in Medium described by a former prison camp guard. Aspects of using dogs to attack prisoners were recently reported in the Christian Science Monitor, itself citing a CIA report.
Witnesses described part of Iraqi prisoner abuse as “sadistic, blatant, and wanton criminal abuses.” There have been reports that military dogs have been used to rape prisoners. And stories exist of “anal hydration” in Afghanistan. For example, an ACLU report citing that CIA personnel used anal rape hydration in Gardez prison, Afghanistan.
The Medium report also notes a sharp increase of former military personnel arrested on child pornography charges and child rape tourism, including dogs in Kenya. These all seem to point to a terrible series of incidents that can bring many to tears.
If we can corroborate such reports, responsible military personnel, including their political minders, must be held accountable, as few worse crimes exist than those reported. And it will be only a matter of time for investigations to determine the truth.
The issue here is proof. We do have direct evidence of attack dogs being used in Abu Ghraib prison by U.S. military personnel. Of course, dogs were used against Iraqi prisoners after Wikileaks showed photographic evidence of naked Muslim men attacked by dogs.
So we have evidence dogs were used to terrorize accused terrorists. We are not disputing these historical interrogation methods have gained valuable intelligence. But we must uncover how widespread rape dog use was overseas, assuming US personnel used this interrogation method. And we must understand sexual blight may have perverted many soldiers, including CIA personnel.
Narcissist personality types and others may find this type of torture gratifying. My research showed numerous bestiality websites across the web that anyone can view, which could fuel the fire of sexual depravity. It is no imaginative stretch that many former CIA personnel and even troops are retired US residents.
We know former dog handlers often adopt their former working dogs. So people trained in enhanced interrogation and dog handling, including their dogs, have come home.
The problem for parents and dog abused children will be evidence production. We have seen recent lawsuits against the top-secret Area 51, with “National Security” concerns likely dooming these suits, leaving families suing the dog’s owner. But former CIA employees will undoubtedly be dead broke; after all, they may spend their life-savings defending against criminal cases.
Defendants may identify the government as a potential respondent. But intimidation will keep most lawyers from suing. And sovereign immunity would most certainly become invoked by the state. In my opinion, the only real way to continue a case like this is to dis-empower the federal government and to limit it to Article I, Section 8, as required by the Constitution.
The federal government can crush anyone, so it remains doubtful any admissible discovery could prove your case. A judge would likely seal the case and dismiss the victims’ claims based upon “national security.” Courts have expanded the powers of the politicians appointing them.
Rightful liberty is unobstructed action according to our will within limits drawn around us by the equal rights of others. I do not add ‘within the limits of the law’ because law is often but the tyrant’s will, and always so when it violates the rights of the individual.
The opponent’s parents will face a government; our founders would not recognize it as legitimate.
George Orwell wrote of this in his book 1984, stating:
“If you want a vision of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face – forever.”
The only way we can change this situation is to start electing representatives who:
“know the law and mean to keep it well” – Blackstone.
For example, the news media has become enslaved by corporate advertisers. Most politicians pursue money and power. After all, that comes with their election. Free speech is now more about partisanship and protecting the government.
After all, secular humanists have rewritten our history to mean that it is the government and not a Creator that bestowed our rights. And this is even though our Constitution incorporates our Independence date and thus the entire “Unanimous Declaration” into the Constitution.
Unfortunately, none of the Obama appointees to the High Court agreed. They won’t recognize this fact. And instead, they tend to embrace a Roman Civil Law type of philosophy. But that is not consistent with our Constitutional Republic.
“which from their verbosity, their endless tautologies, their involutions of case within case, and parenthesis within parenthesis, and their multiplied efforts at certainty by saids and aforesaid, by ors and by and, to make them more plain, do really render them more perplexed and incomprehensible, not only to common readers, but to the lawyers themselves.” (Source.)
Give me liberty or give me death is now “give me free stuff.” And if so, I will blindly support you. Parents should unplug from the state propaganda machine. Parents should study history. And people should learn about their rights. It remains doubtful we will ever know the truth about rape dogs. We won’t know until we, the people look to find the answers and solutions. I will love to interview you if you have information about this heinous act.
5001 Airport Plaza Dr Ste 210
Long Beach, CA 90815
8752 Holloway Drive Ste 304
West Hollywood, CA 90069
201 Wilshire Blvd. Fl 2
Santa Monica, CA 90404
Torrance, CA 90505
4640 Admiralty Way Ste 500
Marina del Rey, CA 90292
509 S Beverly Dr
Beverly Hills, CA 90212
655 N Central Avenue
Glendale, CA 91203
8333 Foothill Blvd #200
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
11801 Pierce St, Ste 200
Riverside, CA 92505
198 North Arrowhead Ave. #20
San Bernardino, CA 92408
600 Anton Boulevard #11
Costa Mesa, CA 92626
23046 Avenida de la Carlota, Ste 600
Laguna Beach, CA 92651
9180 Irvine Center Drive
Irvine, CA 92612
5160 Birch St #110
Newport Beach, CA 92660
333 City Blvd. #17
Orange, CA 92868
1999 S Bascom Ave, Ste 700
Campbell, CA 95008
50 Francisco Street #460
San Francisco, CA 94133
1902 Wright Pl, Ste 200
Carlsbad, CA 95008