UPDATE: As of the anniversary today, the Bryant lawsuit, along with those of surviving families is on hold, awaiting potential transfer from state court to federal court, at the behest of the U.S. Attorney, discussed below.
The facts relate that on June 26, 2020, helicopter pilot Ara Zobayan, passengers in tow, boarded a Sikorsky S-76B (N72EX). The Bryant party’s helicopter departed Orange County, wheels up, steering a path to the Camarillo Airport helo tarmac. (See Google Images here). The Kobe Bryant ground transportation team was to deliver Bryant’s party of eight by limousine to Bryant’s Thousand Oaks Mamba Sports Academy, so they could watch Bryant’s students compete playing early baseball academy games.
This same group flew incident-free to the same destination a day prior, and “Pilot in Command” (PIC) Zobayan flew NBA star, Bryant, using this route at least 10 times previously the last year. Aviation experts and others have many theories about who caused the Bryant party’s helicopter crash, including inclement weather creating heavy clouds.
Kobe’s surviving widow asserts the helicopter pilot was reckless and negligent. She claims the pilot operated the chopper dangerously, with a pilot error causing the Friday morning aerial disaster. Shining light on helicopter crash causation and future crash prevention was our goal in writing this wrongful death law piece.
Kobe Bryant’s fatal helicopter crash caused painful nationwide shockwaves.
This action was originally filed in the Superior Court of the State of California, County of Los Angeles, and assigned case number 20STCV07492 (LEAD Case Related to Cases: 20STCV14963, 20SCTV14973, and 20STCV17897).
The all-star reputation of championship-winning basketball legend Kobe Bryant demonstrated basketball skills only Michael Jordan’s fans had experienced circa 1980 and 1990. Our forever famous and beloved former Lakers star sought a quiet retirement filled with peace and serenity. But as most wrongful death attorneys will tell you, the only thing certain in life is death and taxes.
Surviving families will suffer excruciating torment, sad funeral memorial services, income, love, and consortium losses. An at-fault-party causing a loved one’s helicopter-related death creates far more harrowing devastation for surviving family members than death from natural causes.
News of the surviving family’s recent lawsuit brings back tragic memories over Kobe Bryant’s death months into the current Coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic. Our lawyers looked at text messages and communications between pilot, passengers, ground elements, forward air controllers, all shedding some light exposing that dreadful, dreary Sunday morning. We also researched helicopter crash topics highlighting critical helicopter travel weaknesses.
Kobe Bryant’s post-crash saga took a surprising turn for air-traffic controllers and helicopter transport company flying the doomed excursion passengers. Bryant’s widow and successor in interest, Vanessa Bryant’s lawsuit filed in Los Angeles Superior Court, seeks a jury award of money damages from the helicopter company and Zobayan’s estate. Her lawyers have asserted all along that these defendants failed to exercise heightened passenger care duty standards. Interestingly, she failed to name OC Helicopters as a defendant until later in the game.
Public safety agents, common carriers, and private travel agencies will undoubtedly adopt stricter, safer regulations from the former champion’s death. We hope the aftermath of this case results in changes avoiding a needless helicopter death of your close family member.
JOHN JAMES ALTOBELLI, AN INDIVIDUAL AND AS SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST TO ALYSSA ALTOBELLI, JOHN ALTOBELLI, AND KERI ALTOBELLI, ET VS ISLAND EXPRESS HELICOPTERS, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION, ET AL.
6/29/2020 – Answer Island Express.
8/19/2020 – IEX-Cross-Complaint.
11/04/2020 – Answer OC Helicopters.
CHRISTOPHER CHESTER, ET AL. VS ISLAND EXPRESS HELICOPTERS, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION, ET AL.
05/11/2020 – Complaint.
6/29/2020 – Answer Island Express – Chester State Court.
6/29/2020 – Answer Zobayan.
7/6/2020 – Amendment Adding OC Helicopters as a defendant. Amendment to Complaint (Fictitious/Incorrect Name).
8/19/2020 – Cross-Complaint.
MATTHEW MAUSER, AN INDIVIDUAL, AND AS SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST TO CHRISTINA MAUSER, ET AL. VS ISLAND EXPRESS HELICOPTERS, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION, ET AL.
04/20/2020 – Mauser Complaint.
6/29/2020 – Answer of Island Express.
6/30/2020 – Amendment to Complaint Adding OC Helicopters. (Fictitious/Incorrect Name).
8/19/2020 – IEX Cross-Complaint/Indemnity.
11/4/2020 – Answer OC Helicopters.
Why Is Island Express Cross Complaining Against Air Traffic Control?
Island Express Helicopters launched their own lawsuit. USA Today reported that Island Express is hanging its hat on the theory that air traffic controllers negligently refused the pilot’s safer flight path request, failing to “…effectively communicate the situation during a shift change just before the crash.” These defendants are cross-complaining against the air traffic controllers responsible for coordinating Bryant’s foggy flight path. An attorney for Island Express reportedly claimed this was a “tragic accident,” and he denied his client’s culpability.
Plaintiff, Island Express Helicopter company alleges a “series of erroneous acts and omissions” by Southern California TRACON traffic controllers dropped the chopper from the sky during foggy conditions. Zobayan’s estate and Island Express argue their passengers are owed nothing. These defendants assert dying or suffering severe injuries during flight were known risks associated with flying. These defendants claim the passengers assumed flying risks by volunteering to travel via helicopter.
“Tactically this was a brilliant move. This forced the hand of the U.S. Attorney, and will likely result in the entire Bryant Matter and related actions being consolidated in the far less plaintiff-friendly federal court system,” said Los Angeles personal injury attorney, Michael Ehline.
Vanessa’s lawsuit alleges: “no fewer than 8 sheriff’s deputies at the crash site, pulled out their personal cell phones and snapped photos of the dead children, parents, and coaches. The deputies took these photos for their own personal gratification.” “This lawsuit is about accountability,” according to Bryant’s lead counsel, Luis Li, “… preventing this disgraceful behavior from happening to other families in the future who have suffered loss.”
A local citizen complained to the LA County for allowing a Sherriff’s deputy to share disgusting cell phone crash scene images while he was visiting a Norwalk, California bar. However, Sheriff Alex Villanueva tried covering everything up, only agreeing to investigate after the Los Angeles Times exposed the cover-up, forcing Villanueva’s hand.
Matthew Mauser, the surviving husband of one of the decedents, sued the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department, alleging that his three children and he underwent a damaging invasion of privacy, causing these plaintiffs emotional distress, anxiety, humiliating them “from the realization that photographs of their mother and wife were wrongfully taken, shown and discussed.”
Governor Gavin Newsom of California recently signed legislation introduced by Mike Gipson (D) criminalizing activities by peace officers, including first responders from taking unauthorized photos of dead people at crime and accident scenes.
Noted above, Sofia Urbieta Laine, then 68, filed her 48-page lawsuit claiming Kobe Bryant “promised to take care” of her for her remaining lifespan.
However, Vanessa Bryant denounced her mom’s lawsuit, claiming her mother is not owed years of pay for working as an unpaid assistant, nor did Kobe promise her lifetime. The Los Angeles Times quoted Vanessa, writing that Kobe’s mother in law was attempting to “extort a financial windfall.”
The Los Angeles County Fire Department (FD) asserts 50-year-old Imbrenda’s demotion stemmed from his failure to cooperate during the graphic crash scene photo investigations spurred by Vanessa’s lawsuit against the County of Los Angeles. Imbrenda asserts his demotion violated his employment rights under California Government Code Section 3260, Government Code Section 3254, including Labor Code Section 1102.5.
Hence, he filed his employment retaliation lawsuit on 11/18/2020. However, the County appears to equate his refusal to give them his private property, as obstructing justice. His bosses say his demotion was based upon his knowledge Sheriff’s deputies were being investigated for sharing gruesome images, spurring Bryant’s Title 42 Section 1983 lawsuit. Captain Imbrenda’s response was to alert firefighters who texted sent him crash area photos, soliciting these underlings to delete all crash scene images.
On June 17, 2020, The U.S. National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) released approximately 1,700 pages of documents, text messages, interview transcripts, emails, and crash studies. NTSB calculations and pictures illustrated the helicopter’s trajectory. The fog obscured the hillside as the rotor winged aircraft crashed. The NTSB timeline illustrates the passenger’s last moments before slamming into a fog-obscured Calabasas hillside, killing all nine people on board. A previous report by the NTSB didn’t find any engine or mechanical failure.
Before Island Express launched any Kobe Bryant (KB) flight, they transmitted a “KB group text.” KB’s chauffeurs, including Patti and Ric from OC Helicopters, Whitney Bagge (IEX Vice President), KB’s Pilot, and the rest of the KB air-ground team, received real-time texts, including flight and ground data. This texting system helped promote effective communication between the entire KB air-ground team. Key air-ground team players were text updated during lift-off, landing, communicating anticipated arrival times. Because of this, KB limo and SUV drivers awaiting at their designated locations were able to transition Kobe from air to ground transportation promptly.
Patti Taylor, the broker, arranging Bryant’s flights and ground transport through OC Helicopters, reviewed the KB transportation plan.
“6:11 PM – Good Evening KB tomorrow Sunday, January 26, Please note requested revised departure 8:45 heli ready, 9:00 am departure, SNA CMA SNA N72EX Ara, Driver 1 Gary, Driver 2 Robert, Pax KB GB Et al. (full names weights given prior) Return approx. 3 pm-ish. Advised weather could be an issue….” – Patti Taylor
“Copy Will advise on weather early morning” – Pilot Zobayan.
“Weather look ok tomorrow?” – Patti Taylor.
“Just checked and not the best day tomorrow, but it is not as bad as today” – Pilot Zobayan.
Kobe changed his departure time from 9:45 a.m. take off to 9:00 a.m., to attend an earlier scheduled game in Thousand Oaks, returning at 3 p.m. that same day. The new batch of transportation records doesn’t draw any hard and fast conclusions about the helicopter crash. However, this evidence does provide a blow-by-blow account of Bryant’s last flight from Zobayan’s girlfriend. Evidence, including recordings, documents, transcripts, and statements from the S-76B mechanics, air traffic controllers, pilots, OC Helicopter and Island Express employees of the charter company and broker, Kobe’s personal assistants, and crash eyewitnesses are incorporated by reference in the extensive review.
Based upon a series of text messages published by Associated Press (AP) and the LA Times, beginning Sunday morning, January 26, 2020, our experts developed their own timeline as follows:
Kobe Bryant and eight others boarded the helicopter, entering the cockpit from the Atlantic Aviation ramp pathway. The passengers included daughter Gianna Bryant, John Altobelli (veteran-head baseball coach at Orange Coast College), his wife Keri, their daughter Alyssa, Gianna’s teammate, Sarah Chester, and her daughter Payton, who was Gianna’s other teammate, and Christina Mauser, their assistant Coach.
Their helicopter navigated, referencing Interstate 5 Freeway, California, heading to Los Angeles, circling Glendale 12 minutes, finally hugging I-101 Thousand Oaks.
At 7:30 a.m. on January 26, 2020, pilot Zobayan triggered a group text when he explained the weather was:
Zobayan flew the S-76B helicopter from Long Beach Airport to John Wayne Airport, landing at 8:39 a.m., allegedly reviewing the upcoming flight with Webb, using the ForeFlight app.
Broker Patti Taylor messaged the transportation team, texting the Sikorsky S-76B was “wheels up.” Zobayan flew northwest.
Gary, the limo driver, sent a text at 9:33 a.m., stating it “Just started raining lightly here,” around 9:33 a.m., while he was parked at Camarillo Airport, awaiting the helicopter’s final destination.
At 9:44 a.m., Zobayan told the air traffic controller he was flying in thick clouds, west of Van Nuys, signaling his wish to climb, stating:
Air traffic control received no answer to their question, asking multiple times. We know the aircraft slammed into a mountain near Las Virgenes Road, experts estimating the bird fell from the sky amid dense fog, slamming into a steep mountainside near the 4200 block of Las Virgenes Road and Willow Glen Street around 9:45 a.m.
“Land?” another broker employee texted at 9:48 a.m., three minutes after the flight had been scheduled to arrive.
At 9:49 a.m., Patti Taylor texted Whitney Bagge, asking him for the IEX the helicopter’s coordinates, with Spidertrack’s aircraft tracking application offlining at 9:45 a.m., despite the IEX vice president constantly refreshing the tracker. Bagge snapped a cell phone screenshot of Kobe’s flight circling Glendale, making Taylor believe there was a mere delay in flight traffic.
Gary, the driver group texted, “Not yet.” After team members failed to receive updates for an uncomfortable thirteen minutes of radio silence, the die had been cast; lives were lost.
Taylor explained later her thought process that day to investigators, stating: “It looks like he got held up in airspace or Kobe wanted to look at something over there, which wasn’t uncommon.”
She prayed the tracker was just broken but told Angel Perez, the Island Express ground operations manager, to pull its emergency response manual.
Ric Webb later told NTSB investigators:
After breaking slumber, Zobayan’s girlfriend texted Zobayan, but her transmission failed, raising her alarm.
Bagge texted Angel, “Go to the Emergency Response Manual now.” – NTSB Report
At 10:22 a.m., Island Express instituted emergency response procedures, their manual requiring dispatch of a separate Island Express helicopter to Kobe’s last known coordinates. (“…last location on the tracker for N72EX.”) Still, five minutes later, that reconnaissance mission was canceled. Text and radio messages transmitted to Zobayan had by now fallen upon deaf ears, with Webb calling Angel expressing grave concern.
Kobe’s driver and controllers at Camarillo Airport had not seen his helicopter. Ultimately, Dalton, who drove his automobile in Calabasas’s direction, confirmed where electronic tracking had stopped after rumors of a helicopter crash.
10:27 AM – “I called Angel and told him to have N114MX turn around there is a confirmed airplane crash in the same area where N72EX’s tracker stopped. N114MX needs to go back to the hanger and shut down for the day. Cancel all remainder flights for the day, and Garret will call with instructions and with what else he needs to do.” – NTSB Report.
Anyone who owed Kobe and Gianna a particular duty of care during transport can be sued for Kobe’s wrongful death. Duty of care owed depends on the status of the defendants, decedents, and suing parties.
CACI is California Judicial Council approved jury instructions derived from California statutes and codes. Our superior lawyers will cover CACI instructions rather than the older BAJI version still used by courts. Basically, these forms assist jurors, helping determine liability, including money damage calculations.
Whether or not Island Express Helicopters, brokers, and others transporting Kobe that fateful day owed any legal liability to Kobe’s surviving family members depends primarily on three tort law principles:
Vanessa must convince the court that Island Express, including others exercising substantial control over the flight, is vicariously liable for the acts of their servant, Zobayan. Vanessa Bryant’s lawyers must prove Ara Zobayan flew the Bryant party while pilot Zobayan was engaged in the course and scope of his employment duties under CACI No. 3720 [scope of employment]. She must also prove that Pilot Zobayan did not frolic or detour from his employment transportation duties. Here, the pilot flying is a task reasonably related to his employment responsibilities. (See also CACI No. VF-3700).
Defendant Island Express Helicopter company may argue flying duties performed by a helicopter pilot; Ara Zobayan remained independent from employment with IEX. IEX may seek a CACI No. 3704 instruction from the trial court, demanding a jury answer employment status questions.
Vanessa Bryant must prove Island Express vicarious liability by using a fact-based test. CACI No. 3704 says you are not an independent contractor if a plaintiff can prove one or any of the below facts:
Ehline Law Firm thinks evidence shows Zobayan acted as IEX’s employee, so the court will probably let a jury decide fault using vicarious liability theory.
“Liability for negligent supervision and/or retention of an employee is one of direct liability for negligence, not vicarious liability.” (Delfino v. Agilent Technologies, Inc. (2006) 145 Cal.App.4th 790, 815).
Vanessa has a decent argument that Island Express and others negligently supervised Zobayan since they permitted heavy fog flying. Here, Vanessa will argue Zobayan was incompetent or unfit to fly that day, making Island Express’ poor supervision and hiring a substantial factor causing Kobe and Gianna’s wrongful death.
Based upon the facts so far, we don’t see any solid evidence that Zobayan had a custom, habit, or practice of flying in risky, bad weather. On the other hand, evidence exists showing IEX left Zobayan’s decision to fly in bad weather to Zobayan alone. Therefore, this instruction may also be used in determining party liability.
3. Negligent Entrustment of a Motor Vehicle is another theory Vanessa could use since the helicopter is a motorized vehicle. Arguably, it wasn’t very responsible for OC Helicopters and IEX to allow flying in a heavy fog. Not enough facts exist here to make this determination.
1. Ordinary Negligence – General, Lesser – Ordinary Duty of Care
For example, friends or family members transporting you in a car, not for hire, will owe all passengers and road users a basic duty of care, behaving reasonably, without exposing others to harm. (See also CACI No. 401).
2. Common Carrier Liability – Heightened, Greater Duty of Passenger Care
The term “common carrier” means and refers to companies and people transporting passengers for hire, including:
Basically, any livery or carriage service transporting human beings is likely classified as a common carrier. Typically, these for-hire livery businesses will be subject to greater passenger care duties.
CACI No. 902. “Duty of Common Carrier” – “Common carriers must carry passengers [or property] safely. Common carriers must use the highest care and the vigilance of a very cautious person. They must do all that human care, vigilance, and foresight reasonably can do under the circumstances to avoid harm to passengers [or property]. While a common carrier does not guarantee the safety of its passengers [or property that it transports], it must use reasonable skill to provide everything necessary for safe transportation, in view of the transportation used and the practical operation of the business.”
Cruise ship and aircraft transport common carriers will owe their passengers differing duties than land-based carriers using public roads will owe. Although trip tickets and waivers within passage contracts can limit certain carrier liabilities, both public and private common carriers will fail to escape specific legal duties no matter the contract’s terms.
A common carrier’s special/heightened duties to a passenger will include:
Note: Passengers on luxury cruises can hold an ocean-going passenger ship strictly liable for injuries inflicted by the ship’s crewmembers, including passenger rape and sexual assault cases arising from supervised shore excursion activities. The cruise ship captain must be held responsible for his crew members’ bad acts under strict liability theory. (Read more).
Island Express Helicopters and their helicopter pilot, Ara Zobayan, transported passengers and carried luggage. Hence, these defendants will be deemed common carriers, barring the defendant’s discovering additional facts avoiding this greater duty.
A common carrier voluntarily accepting a child as a passenger must provide additional care reasonably and necessarily calculated to ensure the child’s safety. “In this instruction, the court admonished the jury that a carrier of passengers owes to children who are passengers on its cars a greater degree of care than it owes to adults. Such an instruction is proper.” (Mudrick v. Market Street Ry. Co. (1938) 11 Cal.2d 724, 734).
Money damages surrounding Kobe and Gianna Bryant’s death will only be awarded to a survivor listed in California’s wrongful death statute, including.
If the jury favors Vanessa Bryant’s side by awarding her wrongful death damages against Island Express Helicopters et al., these triers of fact must still determine reasonable compensation using CACI No. 3921 because Kobe died after reaching adulthood status. Although Vanessa’s burden will fall below proving her exact damages amounts to the trier of fact, the trial judge will bar damages calculation methods involving a hunch, guess, or those methods calling for speculation.
Again, CACI helps the jury objectively calculate reasonable dollar amounts valuated as foreseeable, certain, and unavoidable consequences stemming from Kobe’s helicopter crash, ultimately causing the plaintiff’s suffering and losses from a wrongful death.
Vanessa and other plaintiff’s damages for Kobe’s death will fall into two categories as follows:
Wrongful Death Economic Damages Include:
However, any future economic damages award must be reduced to present cash value.
Vanessa Bryant’s Wrongful Death Non-Economic Damages Will Include Compensation For:
CACI No. VF-3905, dealing with damages for Wrongful Death (Death of an Adult), contains a section listing specific dollar calculation amounts alongside each item of damages, so the math is made easier for jurors.
Vanessa Bryant’s non-economic damages must be paid promptly upon judgment without being further reduced to present cash value. Defendants may argue that Vanessa Bryant should be entitled to little general damages, asserting she remained in a marriage of convenience, pointing to Kobe’s extramarital activities and Vanessa’s petition for marital dissolution here. But Vanessa will likely argue she reconciled with Kobe, and that was water under the bridge.
Vanessa may also seek reasonable compensation for the death of her child, Gianna’s, including compensation covering:
1. Past present and future economic losses amounting to the value of lost financial support, gifts, or benefits, including the reasonable value of decedent’s household services, if any, contributed during the life expectancy Gianna had before her death or the life expectancy of Vanessa Bryant, whichever is shorter. Gianna’s funeral and burial expenses, including contributions Vanessa could have expected Gianna to provide, reduced to present cash value, will be included in Vanessa’s award of economic damages without reducing present future care values.
2. Past, present, and future non-economic losses, amounting to the value of lost love, companionship, comfort, care, assistance, protection, affection, society, and moral support, will not be reduced to present cash value.
A Code Civ. Proc. Sec. 377.30 survival action is included in the Vanessa Bryant lawsuit seeking damages on behalf of decedent Kobe and Gianna for their own deaths. Vanessa’s “wrongful death” claim only will compensate her direct losses and suffering. A survival cause of action will normally be filed when a decedent fails to die immediately after their accident or injury, but sometimes decedent surviving a short period suffices in allowing the claim forward. However, even living just a few seconds before death may form the basis for a survival cause of action.
Vanessa seeks damages that Kobe and perhaps Gianna sustained before death these two were entitled to recover, including:
A survival cause of action can be filed by the estate’s personal representative, or if none has been appointed, by the decedent’s successor-in-interest. Damages recoverable under the statute include “the loss or damage that the decedent sustained or incurred before death, including any penalties or punitive or exemplary damages that the decedent would have been entitled to recover had the decedent lived, and do not include damages for pain, suffering, or disfigurement.“
Basically, the California survival statute allows the estate’s conservator or other interested parties to “step into the shoes” of the deceased and recover the damages. (County of Los Angeles, 21 Cal. 4th at pp. 303-304, internal citations omitted) Here, Vanessa will seek the damages her deceased husband and child would have been entitled to have they survived, including medical costs and lost wages, penalties, and exemplary, punitive damages.
The NTSB post-crash incident report contains sections dealing with ‘calculated apparent angles.’ Aviation experts at the NTSB believe the evidence shows Kobe Bryant’s helicopter pilot, Ara Zobayan’s decision to fly in bad weather, including a heavy fog bank, tend to show “Mr. Pilot Man” [Bryant’s affectionate nickname for his favorite pilot] ‘misperceived both pitch and roll angles.’
The NTSB’s aircraft performance study said the helicopter banked left and away from the 101 while communicating with the controller. When Zobayan said the helicopter was climbing, it was actually descending. According to the study, the pilot “could have misperceived both pitch and roll angles.”
“When a pilot misperceives altitude and acceleration, it is known as the ‘somatogravic illusion‘ and can cause spatial disorientation,” the report said. In other words, acceleration could cause a pilot to sense his vehicle was climbing when it was not.
As previously reported, Kobe Bryant’s pilot Ara Zobayan wanted to climb higher while hovering about 100 feet above the ground. In mitigation, the same group had flown without incident to the same destination a day earlier — and Zobayan flew Bryant on the route at least 10 times last year.
Interviews conducted by crash investigators and Zobayan’s colleagues described the chief pilot for Island Express as:
LA County’s Fire Chief, Daryl Osby, stated the crash caused a fire, spreading a quarter of an acre before extinguishing.
Jennifer Homendy, a National Transport Safety Board member, said helicopter pieces were scattered across a 600 feet area.
Juries will only return their verdict after knowing the facts. A jury will hear and review testimony, discuss the law, including evidence, and determine witness credibility.
Moreover, these triers of fact must decide duty owed and whether the breach of that duty was a substantial factor causing an injury, including whether the widow’s and decedent’s survival action damages are reasonable.
We already know the pilot breached FAA rules by trying to fly up through the clouds without a half-mile or more of visibility, raising a high likelihood the jury here will find the defendants are liable to pay Mrs. Bryant. And although aviation laws did not require IEX to maintain a terrain awareness warning system (TAWS), warning PIC Zobayan pilots he was flying too close to obstacles, a jury may find it was negligent to not have such a system for this particular, foggy flight path so often flown by Kobe.
Because it appears IEX and their pilot will be presumptively at fault under negligence per se doctrine, these defendants may seek bifurcation. A court will use this technique so that it can split liability and damages. That way, if the jury finds defendants liable, parties can negotiate damages. The goal is resolving disputed dollar amounts on the courthouse steps. (See California Rules of Court, Rule 5.390. Bifurcation of issues).
Island Pacific Helicopters would be smart to stipulate to liability here. Bifurcating damages from liability helps defendants see if a jury will use California’s pure comparative negligence doctrine to apportion a percentage of fault to the plaintiff’s or another party, including air traffic controllers.
Defendants’ stipulating to 100% liability may make sense, but bifurcating could see jurors find the defendant’s only partially at fault in trial one. However, even if defendants are found fully at fault, they will retain the option to settle. Now, both defendants can avoid trial two’s damages phase, and plaintiffs can obviate a court remittitur, with a judge reducing a “runaway verdict.”
My many years in the legal field remind me that helicopter crash cases have not seen their end. The wrongful death lawsuit against the flight controllers tips the iceberg in a coming, messy, legal flurry. I don’t usually comment extensively on cases where I maintain no personal involvement. Still, I will present a bird’s eye view covering critical legal issues at play, allowing consumers a better legal explanation and unique understanding of past and future cases.
The helicopter accident lawyers at Ehline Law Firm represent air travel risk victims, especially where a comedy of errors, misjudgments, and fire combined to cause a crash, seminal to the mishap ultimately killing the Black Mamba. The County must manage this distributed responsibility. A jury may find responsible parties liable to pay for the harm caused by Kobe Bryant’s helicopter crash. Hopefully, Angeleno’s seeking to avoid similar tragedies won’t need our superior injury lawyers, but if so, we will help devasted, suffering consumers experiencing a loved one’s death understand a helicopter accident’s many twists and turns.
We just shined a light on helicopter crash causation and future crash prevention, which was our goal. For the author, the death of Kobe Bryant was personal. Born and raised in the Los Angeles area, managing attorney Michael Ehline leads this charismatic team at Ehline Law Firm Personal Injury Attorneys, APLC, specializing in helicopter transport accident cases. Ehline served as a transport safety lobbyist, working with Congress, passing valuable cruise ship safety legislation more than a decade ago, continuing his mission to make our nation’s roads, ships, and aircraft safer.
Michael’s mission remains personal for Ehline both as a husband and father, and personal injury lawyer, with safety’s failure hitting close to home. He sees how the Kobe Bryant crash took such a terrible toll on Bryant’s family, giving Ehline a soapbox to stand on, preaching future helicopter and death accident claims.
Ehline studied the current case forward and backward from any perspective, helping better protect prospective air travel customers. As a former United States Marine, Ehline maintains respect and awe for helicopters, knowing their raw power and potential for fast and safe travel– and terrible crashes as we saw in January.
Ehline writes these columns to inform the public better and hopefully safeguard us from future accidents and crashes. Our team works tirelessly on cases such as this, and we have won hundreds of transport crash cases, winning millions for seriously injured clients. If you wish to learn more about the types of cases we take on, read our website here, and keep reading the article below. Clients seeking to reach Michael or his team can call the number below or email Michael directly by calling email@example.com.
Downtown Los Angeles Office
633 West 5th Street #2890
Los Angeles, CA 90071
5001 Airport Plaza Dr Ste 210
Long Beach, CA 90815
8752 Holloway Drive Ste 304
West Hollywood, CA 90069
201 Wilshire Blvd. Fl 2
Santa Monica, CA 90404
Torrance, CA 90505
4640 Admiralty Way Ste 500
Marina del Rey, CA 90292
633 West 5th Street #2890
Los Angeles, CA 90071
509 S Beverly Dr
Beverly Hills, CA 90212
655 N Central Avenue
Glendale, CA 91203
8333 Foothill Blvd #200
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
11801 Pierce St, Ste 200
Riverside, CA 92505
198 North Arrowhead Ave. #20
San Bernardino, CA 92408
600 Anton Boulevard #11
Costa Mesa, CA 92626
23046 Avenida de la Carlota, Ste 600
Laguna Beach, CA 92651
9180 Irvine Center Drive
Irvine, CA 92612
5160 Birch St #110
Newport Beach, CA 92660
333 City Blvd. #17
Orange, CA 92868
1999 S Bascom Ave, Ste 700
Campbell, CA 95008
50 Francisco Street #460
San Francisco, CA 94133
1902 Wright Pl, Ste 200
Carlsbad, CA 95008