Skip to main content
  • United States Brain Injury Attorney

    Scientists Discover Brain Pain Regions

Unveiling Brain Activity Associated with Chronic Pain

As an inactive U.S. Marine and brain injury lawyer with over a decade of experience litigating and working with brain injury experts, I have much to say about brain signals. Specifically, I am concerned with two brain regions ad treating pain, including self-healing. Scientists have finally recorded pain-related data from inside the brains of people who have chronic pain disorders caused by a stroke or amputation.

Groundbreaking research has identified specific patterns of brain activity linked to enduring agony, marking a significant breakthrough. By employing electrode implants, scientists have pinpointed the regions that become active when a patient experiences excruciating agony and other emotional aspects of an IED, nasty motor vehicle collision, etc. Even arthritis could be a thing of the past without risking patient addiction to narcotics/opioids.

Dr. Fan Wang from Duke University has revealed that over 50 million individuals in the United States suffer constant pangs, with many prescribed opioid medications for relief. This article will shed light on isolating new targets for treating pain without hard-core drugs messing with nerves and other feedback loops and receptors.

Past NIH Dishonesty Means Being More Critical of Peer Review Studies

COVID shed light on how big pharma ad spend can create a false, unhealthy narrative for families. We also learned that, for the most part, Big Pharma and its heads are basically playing musical chairs with heading up the CDC and FDA. If their open and notorious conflicts of interest don’t automatically disqualify ANY health edict they propose, what does?

In past articles, we covered CTE [coupled with negative emotions] and other neurological disorders in the NFL and how the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and their so-called “experts” discredited a doctor who refused to go along with the pharmaceutical industrial complex narrative. So you can rest assured, I check my articles for bias and give little weight to peer-reviewed studies receiving royalties from companies like Pfizer, the WHO, or NIH unless I can verify on my own.

Anyone with a bias like this, who thinks “I am science,” is not someone I can trust with the health of my wife and kids.

So you can trust me; if you’re experiencing pain and want solutions, I am going with nutrition, supplementation, and nonbiased doctors who can truly show me how brains responded to past treatment in forming their hypothesis.

Lead researcher Dr. Prasad Shirvalkar, a neurologist and associate professor of anesthesia at the University of California, San Francisco, and his colleagues had something to say. Shirvalkar and the pain research team at his anti-pain center state that these findings offer compelling evidence that persistent pain operates differently from short-term to constant pain.

“…this is the first time ever chronic pain has been measured in the real world,” said Dr. Shirvalkar.

New Technology Called Optogenetics

The search for new insights into pain processing has located a group of neurons in the central region of the brain’s amygdala. The amygdala is a well-known brain structure that processes emotions, particularly fear. But its unexpected association with pain modulation sheds new light on complex mechanisms underlying pain perception.

Using a cutting-edge optogenetics technique, researchers manipulated the activity of these central amygdala neurons in awake mice. Scientists could control neural activity to suppress the mice’s responses to painful stimuli. Remarkably, silencing the activity of these neurons led the mice to perceive non-painful touch as if it were painful.

These findings suggest that the central amygdala, despite its primary role in emotional processing, also functions as an anti-pain center. It highlights the intricate interplay between pain, emotions, and the neural circuit brain signals involved in these processes. By targeting and manipulating these specific neurons, researchers have the potential to modulate pain perception and potentially develop new approaches for pain management being developed at the University of California, San Francisco, for example.

By harnessing the power of optogenetics and exploring the role of the central amygdala neurons, and their potential inhibitory signals, scientists may be able to improve our understanding of pain. The goal is to bring us closer to finding more effective pain relief methods, raising hopes for millions in perpetual anguish.

Distinct Brain Regions Involved in Chronic and Acute Pain

Recent studies have shed light on the distinct brain regions involved in chronic and acute pain. One significant finding is that constant anguish is processed in a separate brain area called the orbitofrontal cortex (OFC). This particular brain region has not been extensively studied in pain medicine, making it a novel and important discovery for new treatments.

Traditionally, the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) has been associated with the emotional processing of pain and has been the focus of research on acute pain. However, the emergence of studies highlighting the involvement of OFC in unending torment signifies that these two types of torture have different neural underpinnings.

The orbitofrontal cortex is associated with various cognitive functions such as decision-making, emotion, and reward processing. Identifying the OFC’s role in chronic pain processing adds to our understanding of the complexity of anguish perception and how it differs from acute pain.

This newfound knowledge has implications for developing targeted treatments for constant suffering. By recognizing that prolonged discomfort operates through different neural circuits and involves the OFC, researchers and clinicians can explore innovative approaches to pain management that specifically address the unique aspects of constant distress.

Further research will continue to unravel the intricate mechanisms and interactions between brain regions involved in enduring agony. This deeper understanding may pave the way for developing personalized interventions and therapies to alleviate the suffering experienced by individuals with continuous suffering.

The Role of the Orbitofrontal Cortex in Chronic Pain Processing

The role of the orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) in chronic pain processing is significant, as it is a region of the brain associated with decision-making, emotion, and reward. The recent research findings indicate that continuous suffering tends to be processed and experienced in the OFC, a relatively unexplored area in pain medicine.

Traditionally, studies on acute suffering have focused on the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) as a critical region involved in the emotional processing of anguish. However, the distinct findings from this research suggest continuous suffering operates through different neural circuits and involves the OFC more prominently.

Differentiating Chronic Pain from Acute Pain

Understanding the involvement of the OFC in chronic pain perception is crucial for developing targeted interventions and personalized treatments. By recognizing that continued suffering is not simply an enduring version of acute pain but rather a fundamentally different interplay with different brain regions, researchers and clinicians can work towards developing innovative therapies that address the specific mechanisms and circuits associated with endless suffering.

The ultimate goal is to utilize this newfound knowledge to enhance the development of personalized brain stimulation therapies for individuals suffering from severe continuous suffering. By further exploring the role of the OFC and its interactions with other brain regions involved in ongoing distress, researchers aim to improve our understanding of this complex condition and pave the way for more effective physical distress management strategies.

Compare Anterior Cingulate Cortex and Emotional Processing of Pain

Conversely, short-term pain signals seem to be managed by the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), a region already extensively linked to the emotional processing of pain.

Dr. Shirvalkar explains, “It reveals that chronic pain is not just a more enduring version of acute discomfort. It’s a fundamentally different interplay with different circuits.”

Shirvalkar continued, “The hope is that as we understand this better, we can use this information to develop personalized brain stimulation therapies for the most severe forms of pain.”

Unlocking Phantom Limb Pain Secrets

In the study, researchers implanted electrodes into the brains of four individuals experiencing neuropathic discomfort resulting from damage to the nervous system. Three participants suffered continuously following a stroke, while the fourth study participant suffered from phantom limb pain.

Study on Neuropathic Pain and Brain Implants

The electrodes specifically targeted the OFC and the ACC, as previous research indicated that both regions exhibit heightened activity during acute misery experiments.

Traditionally, brain stimulation treatments and brain recording implants primarily focused on physical touch and smarting circuits. However, the research team hypothesized that brain circuits involved in pain’s emotional and cognitive aspects might be more relevant for understanding individual experiences of ongoing distress.

Throughout the study, participants were asked to rate the torment they experienced multiple times daily, including its intensity, type, and emotional impact. They used a remote-control device to record their brain activity for approximately 30 seconds, capturing a snapshot to compare with their self-reported misery levels.

Using computer analysis, the researchers discovered that ongoing distress predominantly relied on the OFC, leading to sustained changes in brain waves that serve as a biomarker in humans. Additionally, they found that OFC activity could predict a patient’s self-reported chronic pain state difficulty.

Dr. Shirvalkar remarks, “We have learned that chronic pain can be successfully tracked and predicted in real-world scenarios. Patients can be monitored while walking their dog, at home, in the morning, and during their daily activities. This study has provided an objective biomarker for this type of pain.” Think about the sensation of a hot oven touching the skin. Now doctors know how to track it in a fundamentally different way.

The researchers applied heat to various parts of the participants’ bodies to understand how the brain responds to short-term (acute) discomfort. While brain activity could predict pain responses in two of the four patients, the ACC emerged as the region most involved in managing sharp torment.

Given that the implanted electrodes can also stimulate deep brain stimulation, the researchers aspire to develop a “pacemaker” for the brain to modulate the onset of continuous suffering. “We are recruiting for a clinical trial to try to develop this therapy in patients,” Dr. Shirvalkar stated. He aims to involve six patients in the next trial phase and then expand to 20 or 30 patients.

Potential for Personalized Brain Stimulation Therapies for Chronic Pain

As noted, the quest to develop objective biomarkers for chronic pain is an ongoing and promising area of research. Accurate biomarkers are measurable indicators that provide objective evidence of a specific condition or disease. In the case of continuous suffering, having objective biomarkers would significantly enhance the diagnosis, treatment selection, and monitoring of patients.

Several studies have made significant progress in identifying potential biomarkers for chronic pain. One approach involves analyzing brain activity using advanced imaging techniques such as functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) or electroencephalography (EEG). By examining patterns of brain activity, researchers aim to identify specific neural signatures associated with long-term suffering.

For example, recent research has shown that chronic pain tends to rely more on the orbitofrontal cortex (OFC), a brain region associated with decision-making, emotion, and reward. Sustained changes in brain waves in the OFC have been identified as potential biomarkers for chronic pain. This means that by analyzing the activity of the OFC, researchers may be able to track and predict a patient’s ongoing distress state objectively.

Another approach to developing biomarkers for unrelenting aches involves analyzing peripheral biomarkers, such as blood markers or genetic factors, that may be associated with ache sensitivity or inflammation. By identifying specific biomolecules or genetic variations linked to chronic pain, researchers hope to develop objective tests that can aid in diagnosing and monitoring chronic pain conditions.

Role of Pain Management and Neurobiology

Pain management and neurobiology play a crucial role in understanding and addressing pain. Researchers can reveal the mechanisms underlying pain perception, transmission, and modulation in the nervous system by studying ongoing suffering. This knowledge helps develop effective pain management strategies, including pharmacological interventions, physical therapies, and psychological approaches.

The goal is to improve the quality of life for patients suffering acute or chronic torment by advancing scientific understanding of pain mechanisms. Ultimately, this can help aid in developing evidence-based treatment approaches.

Objective Measures and New Therapies

The development of objective biomarkers for chronic pain holds great promise for personalized physical distress management. With objective measures, healthcare professionals can better understand an individual’s anguish experience and tailor treatments accordingly. Accurate biomarkers could also help assess treatment effectiveness and guide the development of new therapies.

However, it’s important to note that the field of objective biomarkers scientists found for ongoing distress is still in its early stages, and more research is needed to validate and refine the identified biomarkers. The complexity and subjective nature of a constant ache searching for objective biomarkers and recording activity is challenging. Nevertheless, with technological advancements and collaborative efforts among researchers, the future looks promising for developing accurate biomarkers that can revolutionize the diagnosis and management of chronic pain.

Less Invasive Treatments

Dr. Shirvalkar also envisions the possibility of developing a less invasive method to monitor chronic pain using wearable devices that assess signals from these specific brain regions. This study and his team’s findings may also contribute to exploring less invasive approaches for managing ongoing distress, as Dr. Desimir Mijatovic, a pain medicine physician at the Cleveland Clinic, Ohio, suggested. Techniques such as transcranial magnetic stimulation, which involve the application of an external magnetic signal to the brain to modify the transmission of electrical signals, are already being explored as potential treatments.

These techniques specifically target the regions of the brain implicated in ongoing distress and aim to alter their functioning. The current study may provide valuable insights into effectively utilizing these techniques and targeting specific brain areas to alleviate perpetual anguish.

New Understandings of Chronic Pain

The groundbreaking study, published on May 22 in the Journal of Nature Neuroscience, adds substantial weight to the understanding that chronic and acute pain are distinct phenomena. Dr. David Dickerson, chair of the American Society of Anesthesiologists Committee on Pain Medicine, highlights that acute agony serves a protective purpose, while ongoing distress is a pathologic condition.

Yes, Hope Exists for People Living In Chronic Pain

By identifying and activating the brain regions that are started by torment in rodents, we can understand the role sleep and other stimuli play in suppressing discomfort in human subjects. Chronic pain is not a beneficial mechanism but rather a malfunction of our protective machinery. The study further reveals that ongoing distress is localized in a different part of the brain, reinforcing the need for targeted approaches to manage and treat this debilitating condition in volunteers.

Suppose you suffered incessant torment in a car accident or an incident caused by no fault. In that case, you must ensure your lawyer sets aside enough compensation to cover new treatments and experimental studies involving brain signals and regenerating brain cells, including stem cell therapy. We can help you locate the best neuroscientist and get you on the right trajectory toward dampening or alleviating painful conditions. If you want a free consultation with a top-rated brain injury lawyer in Los Angeles, contact us at (213) 596-9642.


This research was supported by the National Institutes of Health (DP1MH103908, R01 DE029342, R01 NS109947, R01 DE027454), the Holland-Trice Scholar Award, the W.M. Keck Foundation, and a predoctoral fellowship from the National Science Foundation.

Firm Archive

Main Los Angeles Location

633 W 5th Street #2890 Los Angeles, CA 90071 (213) 596-9642.
Animation of injury lawyer, Michael Ehline Animation of injury lawyer, Michael Ehline

Michael Ehline

Michael Ehline is an inactive U.S. Marine and world-famous legal historian. Michael helped draft the Cruise Ship Safety Act and has won some of U.S. history’s largest motorcycle accident settlements. Together with his legal team, Michael and the Ehline Law Firm collect damages on behalf of clients. We pride ourselves on being available to answer your most pressing and difficult questions 24/7. We are proud sponsors of the Paul Ehline Memorial Motorcycle Ride and a Service Disabled Veteran Operated Business. (SDVOB.) We are ready to fight.