When a case goes to trial, both parties have the opportunity to present the facts of the case and support it with evidence. Since the personal injury plaintiff has the burden of proof, they go first, and then the defendant can offer evidence to rebuke the plaintiff’s claims. The evidence is the determining factor in helping the jurors understand the damages dollar figure the plaintiff suffers.
Here are some witnesses an attorney may call in the trial to help establish a compensatory damages award or actual damages judgment in your case for the negligent act.
The people closely associated with the injured party are the ones that can help explain to the jury the extent of the injuries or damage the incident has on the plaintiff’s life. These include close friends and family members who have spent time with the injured party following the incident and know how the incident continues to impact the plaintiff’s life.
If the plaintiff suffered severe injuries, including mental anguish and emotional distress, family members could explain the plaintiff’s struggles or the impact on their routine due to the injuries.
If the accident resulted in time off work, the attorney might bring the employer to the stand. They would question them about how many days the plaintiff missed work, any opportunities or promotions they lost, and relevant questions to help the jury determine lost wages and loss of earning potential as an award of compensatory damages.
Even minor injuries in a personal injury case can lead to medical expenses. The plaintiff’s medical doctor is the best witness to help the jury understand the extent of the injuries and the medical treatment they received.
A medical doctor can also talk about the actual expenses incurred and any other future medical expenses for treatment the plaintiff may require due to their injuries.
Although attorneys may not always call economists in personal injury cases, they can bring an economist in wrongful death claims to help establish the actual damages arising from the death of the plaintiff’s loved one.
In some cases, the jury can understand the pain a plaintiff is going through. Still, in other cases, it may be difficult for them as they may not share a similar personal experience recovery the maximum compensatory damages under California law.
In these types of cases, the attorney may call mental health professionals or therapists to the stand where they describe what mental issues the plaintiff is suffering from following the incident, such as emotional distress and mental anguish, how it continues to impact their lives, and the recovery process.
Mental health professionals can add a lot of weight to sexual assault cases by explaining to the jury the emotional distress the victim is experiencing.
Individuals who suffer permanent injuries may require lifetime care. A life care planner can let the jury know the treatments and equipment needed and assign a dollar value to it.
Besides witnesses, the attorneys also present documents, medical bills, medical records, and pictures of the injuries. They may refer to previous similar cases and connect those cases with the current trial.
When both parties present the facts and evidence during the trial, the jurors pay close attention to what the attorneys bring up and how it may have affected each party. In most courtrooms, jurors can now take notes during legal proceedings to help them calculate compensatory damages awarded.
After the trial, the judge requires the jury to spend time in the jury room and review the evidence to help determine the outcome of the personal injury case. They must rely on their memories, trial exhibits, or the notes they take down.
Generally, the jurors cannot discuss with each other about the case or the evidence prior to deliberation. That way, the jurors can go into deliberation without anyone influencing their decisions. However, during deliberations, the jurors can discuss the facts and evidence presented until they are satisfied with how the incident occurred.
In simpler personal injury cases, reviewing evidence and discussions can take about an hour, but in more complex cases, it could take a day or more. Once the jurors have a good idea about the facts of the case, they will turn to the law.
At the end of the trial, before the jury heads to deliberation, the judge gives them lengthy instructions to follow. All the instructions are orally provided to the jury, but many judges also provide written instructions.
The instructions are simple and cover everything the jury should know about deliberations. It explains how the jury should deliberate, how to analyze the evidence presented and the witnesses at the trial, and the relevant law pertaining to the case.
The judges carefully let the jury know that they should not let their emotions make a decision even if they disagree with the law. It is the fundamental principle of the United States jury system to make decisions based on the law, and the facts/evidence presented rather than their emotions.
However, avoiding emotions and feelings during deliberation can be challenging as it is part of human nature. They may apply common sense to the verdict and let their emotions sway them.
Plaintiff lawyers understand how emotions can influence a decision and try to bring an emotional appeal to their case to have a better chance of winning.
Several situations can create emotional appeal, and these may include the following:
Defense attorneys also understand human nature and how plaintiff lawyers can create emotional appeal, which is why they do not like trying such cases.
Deciding pain and suffering for the jury is challenging, especially when the judge’s instructions do not include information on calculating such damages. A jury can quickly add up medical bills and lost wages to determine economic damages, but they can face challenges when determining non-economic damages, such as pain and suffering.
Judges do not provide too much information on calculating pain and suffering. They let the jury know they must use their good sense, the case’s background and facts, and their experience in determining fair compensation for pain and suffering.
The jury tries to put themselves in the plaintiff’s shoes and think about what they would expect if anyone negligently harmed them as the defendant did to the plaintiff. They would use their good sense and think about how much money they would want if that incident occurred to them and discuss it with each other during deliberation.
Remember, there are all kinds of people on a jury who have various backgrounds and experiences. Discussing during deliberation can help them come to compensatory damages they believe is fair. Once there is a consensus on what they believe is fair, that will be the case’s verdict in the amount of the compensatory damages obtained.
It can be risky for the defendant to leave the case’s decision in the hands of a jury, which is why most cases are settled outside of court rather than going to trial.
In some cases, the plaintiff may be responsible for some of the damages, which can affect compensatory damages. State laws determine how contributory negligence can affect a victim’s ability to obtain compensatory damages. Most US states adopted comparative negligence over contributory negligence in order to receive compensatory damages.
Unlike settlement, where there are only compensatory damages, the court may award punitive damages to punish the defendant and deter others from committing similar acts. The court only awards plaintiffs punitive damages when the plaintiff can prove that the defendant’s actions were grossly negligent or intended to harm the plaintiff intentionally.
There is no particular standard set by the Supreme Court pertaining to punitive damages, and the juries have wide discretion. But it’s harder to recover these extraordinary types of damages, of course.
If you suffered injuries due to another’s negligence, contact us at (833) LETS-SUE for a free consultation, as you may be eligible for compensation and possibly even to recover punitive damages. Our attorneys will help discuss your personal injury case, protect your rights, and pursue an injury claim against the negligent party’s insurance company.